Analysis of Descartes’ Mind/Body Distinction Essay -- Descartes Medit

In his Meditations on initiatory Philosophy, Descartes states I have a clear and distinguishable idea of myself, in as outlying(prenominal) as I am exclusively a thinking and unextended thing, and as, on the other hand, I possess a distinct idea of frame, in as far as it is only an extended and unthinking thing. 1 The concept that the promontory is an intangible, thinking entity while the body is a tangible entity not equal to(p) of thought is known as Cartesian Dualism. The purpose of this essay is to testify how Descartes tries to prove that the perspicacity or soul is, in its essential nature, entirely distinct from the body and whether or not he is successful. While I deem with his theory that the mind and body are distinct, I do not believe the mind is non-extended and I do not agree with Descartes assertion that the mind is capable of existence beyond the body. One of the ways in which Descartes attempts to prove that the mind is distinct from the body is through his assert that the mind occupies no fleshly space and is an entity with which people think, while the body is a physical entity and cannot serve as a mechanism for thought. 1 I believe most of this portion of his range to be true. The body preferably certainly has a physical presence and is not capable of unequivocal or thinking for itself. I begin to disagree with Descartes theory at the point where he states that the mind is non-extended. The mind is assuredly capable of thought, as Descartes states, and has intangible elements in the form of memories and personality characteristics however, I believe that the mind is an extended entity because physical matter is required for these elements to exist. In my opinion, this means that the only logical conclusion is that the brain is the physical extensi... ... ceases to function. Descartes makes very interesting points on the differentiation of the mind and body in Meditation on First Philosophy. His position on the body being a s trictly physical entity while the mind is not is a superb point of debate that can be applied on more different levels with many different results. Overall, I believe that there are some areas of Descartes position that could be modified or expanded upon given what has been learned to the highest degree the brain through modern science. Nonetheless, given the knowledge available during his lifetime, I believe that Descartes is generally successful in proving his viewpoint to be the pay one. Works Cited 1 Descartes, Rene. Meditations on First Philosophy. 1641 Translated by John Veitch (1901) Meditation 6, http//www.classicallibrary.org/descartes/meditations/9.htm